Designing for Urban Green Synergy

Master thesis

Utrecht
Master thesis
Cum laude
Biodiversity loss and climate change put Dutch cities under pressure, which necessitates a transition towards nature-inclusive urban environments. This research paper proposes a transition strategy to empower residents to take ownership of public space and initiate this transition.

The following text is a summary of my master thesis. Click here for the full report.

1. Introduction

Dutch cities currently face many challenges like biodiversity loss and climate change. Biodiversity loss threatens ecosystems, and climate change increases risks like flooding and heat stress. Addressing these issues requires societal transitions toward nature inclusivity.

This lack of exposure to nature might in the long term lead to citizens being less likely to take action to improve nature in their living environment. Therefore further excesserbating the need for urban green space. This negative feedback loop is coined as 'extinction of experience' and landscape architects could play an important role in mitigating this.
Extinction of experience
The 'extinction of experience' (left) and opposite (right), which is the desired situation in pre-war working class neighborhoods.
Design location
In pre-war working class neighborhoods, this transition towards nature inclusivity is even more urgent as it's dense urban structure leaves little room for green space. The city of Utrecht in The Netherlands has many of these neighborhoods and therefore one of these neighborhoods will be the main focus of this project.

When you map out the ecological hotspots and corridors, a big area can be seen where there are barely any hotspots and corridors. This area forms a huge ecological barrier that coincides with the many pre-war working class neighborhoods of Utrecht. The neighborhood Lombok is in a great position to bridge this barrier and greatly improve the ecological resilience of Utrecht as a whole.
Groene barrière Utrecht, de groene gebieden in en rond Utrecht, de locatie van de volksbuurten in Utrecht en de locatie waar de barrière met natuurinclusieve interventies doorbroken kan worden.
Ecological hotspots and corridors in and around Utrecht and the ecological barrier that divides both sides of the city.
Research question
The resulting research question for this thesis is: “What is a potential transition strategy that can be used to facilitate the transformation of public space in Lombok towards nature inclusivity while enhancing residents’ sense of ownership of public space?”

This question will be answered through three subquestions:
1) How did Lombok evolve throughout the years and what is the current demographic and ecological state of the neighborhood?
2) What design principles can be utilized to ensure ecological quality and catalyze community ownership in the public space of Lombok?
3) How can these design principles be applied in the context of Lombok?

2. Analysis

History and demographics of Lombok
The area of Lombok began with small farms and undustry along the Vleutense Vaart and Leidsche Rijn. When the Merwede Channel was created, bigger industry came to Lombok. The workers of these factory needed housing and therefore the construction of Lombok started. In 1950, most of the urban layout of Lombok was completed with the construction of the western part.
Urban layout Lombok (1)
The development of Lombok, from left to right: 1890, 1923 and 1948. In green, farm buildings are highlighted and industry in yellow. (Topotijdreis, n.d.)
After the Second World War demographics of Lomok changed due to an influx of migrants from Morroco and Turkey. Lombok became one of the first multicultural neighborhoods of Utrecht with many entreponeurs with a migration background on the Kanaalstraat. Currently demographics are shifting again with an increase in young households without a migration background.
Kanaalstraat
The main street of Lombok, Kanaalstraat (1999) (Het Utrechts Archief, n.d.)
Ecological state of Lombok
State of green Lombok
Ecological hotspots, corridors and barriers within Lombok.
Even though the overall amount and quality of urban green space in Lombok is lacking, there are some note worthy ecological hotspots and corridors. However, most of these are interupted by barriers that should be lifted in order to create a resilient ecological network.
In order to assess the ecological quality in the rest of Lombok, the 3-30-300 rule was used as an analysis method. This rule of thumb stated that every house should have a view on three trees, tree canopy coverage should be at least 30% and that you should always be within 300 meters of a quality green space of at least one hectare. When you map out all these rules, you can see there are very little streets and houses that comply.
3-30-300 rule
All the public space and houses that have a view on 3 trees, have 30% tree canopy coverage and are within 300 meters of quality green of at least 1 hectare.
Through this analysis, it became clear that the design principles should touch upon the strong historical working class identity these pre-war working class neighborhoods have as could be a binding factor for inhabitants. Furthermore, the design principles should be relevant to the broad demographics that Lombok has to include as many inhabitants as possible. Lastly, a minimum ecological requirement should be established which should be formulated in concrete design principles that are achievable in the most compact public spaces of pre-war working class neighborhoods.

3. Design principles

To facilitate the societal transition towards nature inclusivity, a set of design principles were formulated. These were based on the two parts of the definition of nature inclusivity provided by Buijs et al. (2019, p. 2) which focusses on both ecology and what citizens themselves consider important.
Design principles for ecology
Preserve
When planning urban development in pre-war working class neighborhoods, existing green with ecological qualities should be preserved wherever possible. Because of the ecological state of neighborhoods like Lombok, the little nature that is already there probably has a relatively high impact on its surroundings.
Ecological qualities Lombok
Ecological qualities within Lombok that should be preserved.
Utilize ecological niches
Ecological opportunities can best be described through ecological niches. These are specific environmental conditions that certain organisms require to thrive. For instance, common heather (Calluna vulgaris) that requires acidic, nutrient poor and relatively dry soil. Utilizing the variyty of environmental conditions present in Lombok will ensure a high biodiversity and resilient ecosystem.
Ecological gradients
Some different environmental conditions that form the ecological niches of certain native plants.
A great way of invenorizing the ecological niches, present in and around Lombok, is by looking at sightings of certain species that represent this niche. For instance, the common kingfisher has been spotted near certain water banks in Lombok. This indicates that there is great potential in expanding its habitat to other banks as well.
Ecological niche map Lombok
Sightings of the common kingfisher in and around Lombok. (NDFF, 2024)
Create habitat
Due to the complex nature of ecology, it can be challenging to quantify when an urban ecosystem is functioning sufficiently. There are however some animal species that indicate some level of ecosystem functioning through their habitat requirements. These species can provide a clear set of requirements to keep in mind when designing public space.

By carefully selecting one target species for every urban habitat, many other species that rely on comparable habitats may also benefit. Therefore, the target species should not be seen as a goal in itself, but as a guide for creating a bigger, more complex ecosystem. This makes it easier to explain why certain green interventions are worth the effort.

With these factors in mind, eight target species were selected that can find a suitable habitat in urban settings and require some targeted effort. These target species and their main habitat are:
Target species
Ecological qualities within Lombok that should be preserved.
Design principles for community ownership
The second set of design principles revolve around empowering citizens to take ownership of public space so they can improve it according to what they consider important. For this, the pathways toward transitions for a nature inclusive society described by Buijs et al. (2019) were used as a framework. These pathways explain how civic engagement contributes to transitions in three steps: motivation, action and result.
Steps towards transition
The three steps in which citizens contribute to the transition towards nature inclusivity. Buijs et al. (2019)
Motivation
As previously explained, the interests of citizens are generally aligned to the societal transition towards nature inclusivity. Therefore, inhabitants should have the democratic means to express their perspective on urban development and public support should be a requirement for interventions of all scales. If not, the big interventions needed for nature inclusivity might create a more negative public opinion on sustainable development under inhabitants, which can do more harm than good to the broader goal of initiating a societal transition.
Action
Encouraging bottom-up initiatives is a great way to increase public support towards nature inclusive interventions. Many of these initiatives are relatively small and won’t take more than a few days to implement but together, they have the potential to hugely impact the overall livability and ecological state of neighborhoods.
Result
If the end goal is to promote a societal transition towards nature inclusivity, designers have an important role in communicating to others what this spatially and experientially entails. Therefore, designs should be backed up by tangible benefits that are irrefutable and understandable.

The intended result of these designs is to explore desirable future scenarios for public spaces. Therefore, it is beneficial to deliver multiple options that can be based on multiple scenarios or ambition levels. The goal of these scenarios is to leave room for interpretation and discussions about what kind of future people would like to work towards.

4.Design

Design scenarios
To explore future scenarios for public space in Lombok two design scenarios were constructed to form the basis for zoom-in designs. The intention for multiple design scenarios is to convey that although public space in Lombok is limited, there are multiple ways of achieving nature inclusivity. The two scenarios are based on concentrating urban green space and distributing urban green space.
Design scenarios
Schematic view of the two design scenarios for Lombok
For the first design scenario, big infrastructure networks like access roads and waterways obtain a function as natural arteries of the neighborhood (Figure 45). Because of the high building density of Lombok, these bigger roads and waterways are among the most open public spaces in the area and therefore have the most potency to be transformed into resilient ecological hotspots.
Design scenario 1
Design scenario 1: one continuous park following the bigger infrastructure around Lombok.
The second design scenario revolves around distributing nature within the street network of Lombok (Figure 46). This can be done through the creation of car loops that begin and end at the Vleutenseweg. In between these loops, residential streets get the opportunity to replace streets and parking lots with other functions like community gardens, front gardens, playgrounds and many others.
Design scenario 2
Design scenario 2: seperated car free green spaces, maintained by inhabitants.
Design location 1: Vleutenseweg
The Vleutenseweg is an access road that forms the North-Eastern border of Lombok (Figure 47). The wide and complex street profile was built on top of the former Vleutensevaart that dates back to 1122. Currently, the road has a complex layout with a 50 kilometers per hour road and is regarded as quite unsafe for cyclists and pedestrians.
Vleutenseweg before
Current situation at the Vleutenseweg
Vleutenseweg axo before
The dimentions of the Lombok-side of the Vleutenseweg
As expressed before, starting with small interventions can be a useful way to instill a sense of ownership over public space under residents and although this is just the start of a bigger transition towards nature inclusivity, these interventions can already have a great impact on the habitat of certain target species.
Vleutenseweg axo after (1)
The small interventions that would greatly benefit the local ecology and living experience of inhabitants.
Vleutenseweg - Design scenario 1
To explore the possibilities for nature inclusivity within the forty meter wide street profile of the Vleutenseweg, the previously mentioned design principles and design scenarios were used to visualize what the future Vleutenseweg could look like.

The first scenario focuses on bringing back the Vleutensevaart to create a public space that provides a resilient circular park for all inhabitants of Lombok. In this part of the Vleutenseweg, the connection of the Vleutensevaart and Oude Rijn can be seen which does not only improve the green but also the blue network of Lombok.
Vleutenseweg plan 1
A part of the continuous park around Lombok.
Ecologically, this layout of urban space is incredibly valuable because of its ecological gradient from wet soil to dry soil. Consequentially, this design provides a habitat for all the target species. Because of this ecological completeness, this public space will create many ecosystem services that will drastically improve the overall liveability of Lombok and other neighborhoods that border this park.
Vleutenseweg section 1
By reimagining the fourty meter wide Vleutenseweg, this street can offer many different functions.
Master thesis highlight 1
Vleutenseweg - Design scenario 2
The second zoom-in design of the Vleutenseweg revolves around the preservation of the infrastructure function, but reducing the number of car lanes and removing on-street parking. Because of this, space is created for two community gardens and front gardens for residents living along the Vleutenseweg. These gardens greatly improve liveliness on the street, create ecological value and make it approachable for residents to improve their living environment.
Vleutenseweg plan 2
Community gardens and front gardens for residents along the Vleutenseweg.
The community gardens are wide enough to create a pleasant enclosed environment that can house many different functions like vegetable gardens, local gatherings and a pleasant walking path along the Vleutenseweg. Even though ecologically, the community gardens are more fragmented than the restoration of the Vleutensevaart, they still provide much ecological value through the great plant diversity that community gardens generally have.
Vleutenseweg section 2
Even though the street is still accessible for cars, this street profile offers many benefits for residents.
Master thesis highlight 2
Design location 2: 1e Delistraat
The second design location is the 1e Delistraat, which is a typical residential street in Lombok with a width of only nine meters and the opportunity to park cars on both sides of the street. The houses are relatively small which makes the population density in this narrow street quite high. Because of this, many bikes are parked on the narrow sidewalks which are only one meter wide.
1e Delistraat before
The current situation at the 1e Delistraat
1e Delistraat axo before
The cars parked on both sides of the street leave little room for anything else.
The small interventions that can be implemented in this street mostly make use of the space currently reserved for parking spots. For instance, a pocket park that uses one or multiple spots could create some space for recreation and gatherings, something that currently would not be possible in a street like this. Furthermore, parking spots can be used to plant trees with tree mirrors and bike parking.
1e Delistraat axo after
By utilizing some of the parking spots, many other functions can be added that benefit ecology and residents.
1e Delistraat - Design scenario 1
For a more comprehensive, long term strategy to improve the situation at the 1e Delistraat, the design scenarios were once again utilized as a basis. In the first design scenario, this street remains accessible by cars, but it still needs to meet de basic requirements regarding ecology.

By restricting car parking to only one side of the road, space becomes available to provide inhabitants with wall gardens of half a meter wide which is enough space to plant among other plants, some climbing plants or shrubs. Furthermore, the sidewalk can be widened to one and a half meters, making the street more accessible to people with mobility challenges. If needed, parking spots can be replaced by other functions as well, these include shared cars or bike parking.
1e Delistraat plan 1
Reducing car parking to one side of the road creates opportunity for many different functions.
The side of the road that provides car parking can also be used to plant a row of trees that can break the wind, reduce the urban heat island effect, and greatly improve the image of the street. The tree mirrors underneath can be filled in by inhabitants according to their liking. The parking spots themselves have permeable pavement to ensure water drainage and further mitigate the heat island effect.
1e Delistraat section 1
This multifunctional street profile creates a much more pleasant living environment.
Master thesis highlight 3
1e Delistraat - Design scenario 2
In the second design scenario, the proposed car loops make it possible to make the 1e Delistraat car free. The sides of the street, bordering the car loops can function as parking spaces for shared cars, bikes, and delivery vehicles.

The rest of the street can be completely redesigned according to the needs of the inhabitants of this area. In this design, a communal vegetable garden is created that provides opportunities for inhabitants to cooperate and experience working with nature. On the other side, more wild nature can be created with some recreational value. Especially for kids, this little spot of vegetation could be a great way for them to play and experience the value of nature first hand.
1e Delistraat plan 2
Removing private car parking enables residents to completely rethink the desired purpose of streets.
In the center of the street, space is reserved for a gathering spot with opportunities for residents to sit and get to know each other. Because both sides of this area are planted with dense vegetation, this gathering place has a nice enclosed atmosphere that offers the opportunity for small, locally organized activities.
This semi-enclosed, locally maintained 'street' offers opportunities to adjust public space to residents liking.
Master thesis highlight 4

5. Conclusion

he goal of this project was to study and develop a transition strategy for Dutch pre-war working class neighborhoods. This was done based on the research question: "What is a potential transition strategy that can be used to facilitate the transformation of public space in Lombok towards nature inclusivity while enabling citizens to take ownership of public space?"

Although this project mostly focuses on Lombok, the aim was to construct transition principles that are also applicable to other pre-war working class neighborhoods in Utrecht and the rest of The Netherlands. Many of the pre-war working class neighborhoods in Utrecht coincide with the previously mentioned ecological barrier. When this transition strategy is implemented in these neighborhoods as well, it could have the potency to break this barrier in multiple areas and therefore greatly improve the overall ecological connectivity of Utrecht.
Kaart van de verschillende volksbuurten en hoe het vergroenen van deze buurten de barrière door Utrecht kan verbreken
he pre-war working class neighborhoods of Utrecht and the potency to bridge the ecological barrier by implementing this transition strategy.
Pre-war working class neighborhoods were chosen as a research subject because of the spatial restrictions that come with these kinds of neighborhoods. Typically these restrictions are a lack of public space, a lack of gardens and the long distance to natural rural areas. In order to transfer this project to other neighborhoods, some of the design principles like the target species have to be adjusted to make them ambitious for that specific context.

Other design principles like the democratization of public space would be a great improvement in any other type of neighborhood as the interest of residents always coincide with a more sustainable living environment.